EPA Chief Scott Pruitt: “Science Shouldn’t Dictate American Policy”

You know the drill. The head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Scott Pruitt, has been asked about something scientific and has said something ludicrous in response.

Shortly after announcing that he wants climate researchers to “debate” climate deniers on live TV, he gave a characteristically painful interview to a Texas radio show. Just after appearing to endorse peer-reviewed science, he added that “science should not be something that’s just thrown about to try and dictate policy in Washington DC.”

The idea that science should not dictate nor influence policy is insane. It really doesn’t need to be said that science is one of the key foundations of modern society.

JFK couldn’t have made his famous, rousing speech about heading to the Moon without the advice and expertise of scientific experts, just as lawmakers couldn’t have appropriated funds for the groundbreaking LIGO experiments that detected gravitational waves for the very first time.

Forget America – what about the world? Without science dictating policy, smallpox wouldn’t have been eradicated, hundreds of millions of children would not be alive, and we wouldn’t know that climate change was an existential threat to life on Earth.

Science, as has often been said, is true whether you believe in it or not. It is a constantly self-correcting, unbiased system, one through which our collective understanding of the cosmos advances with each discovery.

Politics is a method in which those with the most convincing argument win elections, regardless of how factual those arguments are.

These two systems are quite different, but in an ideal world, science is used to help the most powerful people on the planet understand what is true and what is not. Evidence is better than reading our future in tea leaves.

This is what happens when science dictates policy. Jose Antonio Perez/Shutterstock

When people like Pruitt say that science should stay out of politics, it’s immediately clear that they have an ulterior motive other than concern about the dilution of one or the other. This type of phrase is wielded by those who are unhappy that science is pointing something out to them that they dislike.

Very few people looked up at the solar eclipse and thought that science was a junk field of academia. Plenty of those with vested interests do, however, consider climate science and vaccines to be incredibly suspect. The reason why is incredibly simple: Acceptance of an eclipse probably doesn’t lose this administration votes, but acceptance of climate science does.

So is it any surprise that the Trump administration is doing all it can to destroy the reputation of scientists and the scientific method at any opportunity? Of course not – but it doesn’t make it any less outrageous.

[H/T: Grist]

More From this publisher : HERE

    Recommended Products

  • Q-Interactive Upgrade Q-Interactive Upgrade - The video, social and SEO ROI closing system pro version
  • FunnelScape - Sales Funnels Pack SocialScape - Portfolio Builder Pack is your business-in-a-box solution. Not only you get to sell your social media service you also get a full blown portfolio that you can use to showcase your various services.
  • eComHubPro Elevation eComHubPro Elevation is a DropShipping course that goes from Newbie to Expert in a Matter of Hours! eComHubPro Elevation Decodes the Dropshipping Madness and simplifies the Process allow the member to Profit Quickly!
  • VIO Agency License

Tags: Life world solar eclipse Trump

Related Post "EPA Chief Scott Pruitt: “Science Shouldn’t Dictate American Policy”"

Billionaire Tom Barrack Throws Harvey Weinstein a Lifeline
Billionaire investor Tom Barrack is circling the